![]() |
Copenhagen in a Nutshellby Daniel Farber[cross-posted from Legal Planet] Rob Stavins has a good, concise overview of the session and the outcome on the Belfer Center website. Not as negative as some other observers, he highlights the extraordinary procecess that resulted in the Copenhagen Accord:
Overall, he sees Copenhagen as a constructive move forward:
I am no expert on foreign affairs, but it seems unlikely to me that continuing with the U.N. negotiating process is going to be fruitful. It worked (up to a point) at Kyoto, because nothing was asked of the developing countries. Even than, the agreement wasn’t able to obtain U.S. agreement. If you think of the key players as Japan, the EU, the US, and the four BRIC countries; Kyoto was only able to get three of the seven to commit to any action. My guess is that the last-minute negotiations at Copenhagen were a harbinger of the future, which will be driven by agreement between the key players — the Great Powers of the coming era.
P.S. Another interesting perspective on Copenhagen can be found here.
|